A New Climate Change Bill with Promise
October 18, 2007 | Posted by Sheryl Canter in Senate
This post is by Sheryl Canter, an Online Writer and Editorial Manager at Environmental Defense.
Today Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner introduced America's Climate Security Act (ACSA), a comprehensive climate change bill that would cap and then cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Capping emissions is a crucial step in the fight against global warming, and this bill may be the one that gets us there.
The centerpiece of the bill is a mandatory cap on emissions from facilities that emit more than 10,000 CO2-equivalents of greenhouse gas in any year. These covered facilities are responsible for about 75 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.
Covered facilities would have to bring their emissions down to 2005 levels by 2012. Then from 2012 to 2050, their emissions would be cut an additional 1.8 percent of 2005 levels each year. This would bring down emissions in covered facilities to 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 70 percent by 2050.
The bill calls for some emissions permits to be auctioned and some to be given away - more free in the beginning, transitioning to a higher percentage sold at auction in later years. The best formula is probably yet to be worked out. The auction revenue would be distributed as follows: 52.25 percent to climate-friendly technology, 19 percent to low-income energy consumers, 19 percent to wildlife adaptation, 5 percent to climate change and national security, and 4.75 percent to a worker training program.
The bill includes an energy efficiency section that strengthens residential efficiency standards and building codes. The sponsors estimate that these policies would result in a total economy-wide reduction of up to 19 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, and 63 percent by 2050.
Importantly, the Lieberman-Warner bill contains an effective approach to managing costs that minimizes economic impacts without compromising climate protection. Other cost management proposals would jettison emissions caps if the price of reducing emissions reached an arbitrary ceiling. Instead, Lieberman and Warner would allow companies to bank emissions allowances, and borrow emissions allowances from future years.
Lieberman and Warner are the chairman and ranking member of a key global warming subcommittee of the Environment and Public Works Committee, and the bill is winning strong bipartisan support. They plan to bring the bill to a markup in their panel within the next few weeks.
28 Responses
Comment from Sebb
October 18th, 2007 at 8:00 pm
We can't borrow CO2 from future years so why should they borrow allowances from the future? Who decides when that loan has to be paid? What if there is a protracted increase in the cost of CO2 - that doesn't change the physics of global warming and the need to reduce emissions.
There are OTHER other bills that do not provide the get-outs that are in the Lieberman-Warner bill - the get-outs that we know will be used and abused, will add to the cost of implementation, and will reduce effectiveness. I don't know why you've chosen this bill - what about Barbara Boxer's? I have waited 20 years for a bill, I can wait another year for the right bill, instead of rushing through a half-measure.
I just love Environmental Defense and AGW is my number one issue but I'm not supporting the bill you've picked.
This window isn't open for a brief window and we have to clutch whatever compromise bill we can. To use another analogy - the horse is out of the barn and the urgency and desire for change is only going to increase as weeks and months go by. States are acting, companies are acting, individuals are acting, the world is acting. When we act we should do it right.
Do you believe that the L-W bill has highest environmental standards of the current bills in committee?
If not, why support it? And if the standards aren't high enough in any of them don't support any bill but lobby for a better one.
Sebb
Comment from Sebb
October 19th, 2007 at 10:18 am
I just read that Barbara Boxer also supports your favorite bill now (she must have dropped her own). I'd be really interested in a side-by-side comparison of the bills and the action that scientists tell is is required to limit temperature rise to 2 degrees (C or F, I forget?).
Sebb
Comment from Sheryl Canter
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:25 pm
The Pew Center has a chart comparing all the bills [PDF].
Pingback from Insider Podcast » Update: Lieberman-Warner Bill in Senate - Environmental Defense
November 14th, 2007 at 2:15 pm
[…] Overview of Climate Security Act from our Climate 411 blog […]
Pingback from Insider Podcast » Conference Call: 3 Critical Weeks - Status of Lieberman-Warner Bill - Environmental Defense
December 3rd, 2007 at 11:22 am
[…] Overview of Climate Security Act from our Climate 411 blog […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Landmark Climate Bill Passes Senate Committee! - Environmental Defense
December 6th, 2007 at 11:34 am
[…] Last night the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee passed the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (CSA) of 2007, a comprehensive climate change bill that would set mandatory caps on U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. This landmark vote brings us one step closer to passing national climate legislation. (See my previous post for more on the legislative process.) […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Dispatch from Bali: Week 1 - Environmental Defense
December 10th, 2007 at 1:18 pm
[…] By far the loudest and most important was the news about the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (CSA) being approved by the full committee in the U.S. Senate. […]
Pingback from Insider Podcast » Conference Call: Landmark Vote on Climate Security Act in Senate - Environmental Defense
December 10th, 2007 at 4:44 pm
[…] Overview of Climate Security Act from our Climate 411 blog […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Why a Bill in 2008: Same Politics in 2009 - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense
January 25th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
[…] Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (CSA) is a solid bill, but it’s not perfect. And this is the last year of the Bush […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Why a Bill in 2008: Good versus Perfect - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense
January 30th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
[…] support the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (CSA)? It’s pretty good, but not perfect. If we wait until after the election, maybe we can […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Banks Consider Risks in Financing Coal Plants - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense
February 4th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
[…] Today we are seeing the culmination of this effort. The three banks - Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley - have announced that they will require utilities seeking financing to prove the new plants would be economically viable under an expected federal cap on greenhouse gas emissions. […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Why a Bill in 2008: Price of Waiting - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense
February 14th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
[…] long-term target in the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act is not at the level that the best science recommends, but its near-term cap is aggressive - more […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » CBO Report: The Real Story - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense
February 21st, 2008 at 6:19 pm
[…] wild success of the cap-and-trade system that reduced acid rain. Banking also is a feature of the legislation currently before Congress, and indeed of every serious legislative proposal that’s been […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Motivating Change towards Clean Energy - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 3rd, 2008 at 4:10 pm
[…] Energy - The Center for American Progress published a detailed and well-documented analysis of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act and how it would affect the economy. They say, "The bill would make significant reductions in […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » On the Plus Side, Bush Recognized the Need for Federal Action on Climate Change - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
[…] to a new analysis from Environmental Protection Agency [PDF] (EPA), the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act - a cap-and-trade bill - can be implemented without significant harm to the economy. EPA says U.S. […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Why a Bill in 2008: The World is Waiting - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:17 pm
[…] is this so? A firm cap with no "safety valve", as in the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008, informs the market of the size of demand for emissions reductions and offsets, and informs […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » How a Bill Moves Through Congress - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm
[…] Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007 (CSA-07) is the most promising climate change legislation we’ve seen yet. You may have heard that it’s "out of subcommittee" and "scheduled for mark-up on December 5th". But what does that mean? […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Environmental Defense President Testifies Before Congress - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm
[…] President Fred Krupp testified before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works about America’s Climate Security Act (ACSA). "There is no more important legislation that this Committee will ever consider than […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Landmark Vote Sets Stage for Global Warming Action - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:22 pm
[…] to avert the global warming crisis. A key Senate subcommittee just passed the Lieberman-Warner America’s Climate Security Act (S.2191) - a bipartisan bill to cap and reduce America’s global warming […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Vote on Climate Change Bill Scheduled for June - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:30 am
[…] A climate change bill hasn’t yet been introduced in the House, but the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act already has passed out of committee in the […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Climate Bill Vote: 10 Senators to Watch - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:32 am
[…] Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act is scheduled for Senate debate and vote the first week in June. We’re closer than we’ve […]
Pingback from How Does Bush Feel About “Cap and Trade” Legislation?
May 2nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
[…] good to hear, but the president still isn’t crazy about bills like the Climate Security Act, which would place mandatory caps on emissions from facilities that emit more than 10,000 […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Global Warming Bill in Connecticut - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
May 12th, 2008 at 11:40 am
[…] hot summer in the world of climate policy. The U.S. Senate will debate the Lieberman and Warner Climate Security Act in June. California regulators are putting the finishing touches on a broad set of recommendations […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Top 5 Reasons Why the Senate Must Act - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
May 15th, 2008 at 11:07 am
[…] Senate is set to vote on landmark global warming legislation in early June - just a few short weeks away. Here are our top five reasons why they must act […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Update: Preliminary Senate Speeches Continue - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
June 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am
[…] afternoon, the Senate approved a procedural motion that forces the Senate to take up the Climate Security Act. But the Senate is the Senate, and people who are set on ignoring the urgent need to act are using […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Every Vote Against This Bill Makes Oil Companies Happier - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
June 9th, 2008 at 10:56 am
[…] coming vote on the Climate Security Act is our best chance to pass climate legislation this year - something the science, the politics, and […]
Pingback from Senate Fails to Vote on Climate Security Act « Care2 Campaigner Blog
June 9th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
[…] the bill, many see it as an important step in the right direction. The bill would put in place a cap-and-trade system for heavy emitters, as well as building regulations and efficiency standards for residential areas. Obviously the […]
Pingback from Senate Fails to Vote on Climate Security Act « Rose Noise
June 9th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
[…] the bill, many see it as an important step in the right direction. The bill would put in place a cap-and-trade system for heavy emitters, as well as building regulations and efficiency standards for residential areas. Obviously the […]
Leave a Reply
You must log in to post comments | Login | Register an account
User comments reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of Environmental Defense Fund. We reserve the right to delete comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. We also reserve the right to delete duplicate comments, or comments that have no relationship to the original post.