Two Supreme Court Victories
April 2, 2007 | Posted by Bill Chameides in Business - General, EPA & Tailpipe Emissions
Planet Earth won a major victory in the Supreme Court today. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had maintained that regulation of greenhouse gases was beyond its authority. Today in a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court disagreed. For background on the case, see our article "Supreme Court Hears Global Warming Case" or the full text of the decision [PDF]. Environmental Defense was one of the petitioners in this case.
And that wasn't the only Supreme Court victory today. The United States and Environmental Defense filed suit against Duke Energy for violating Clear Air Act rules when it renovated its plants, and today the Supreme Court agreed. For background on the case, see our article "Pivotal Clean Air Case Before Supreme Court" or the full text of the decision [PDF].
In both these cases, Environmental Defense was represented by our senior attorney Vickie Patton. I have to say, I'm in awe of what Vickie and our staff have helped to make happen. Pay attention folks - we are seeing history in the making!
3 Responses
Pingback from Climate 411 » Environmental Groups Put EPA on Notice - Environmental Defense
May 22nd, 2007 at 3:16 pm
[…] In 2005, California petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for permission to establish its own, stricter tailpipe emissions standards. Nearly two years have passed, and EPA still has not ruled on the request - despite a recent Supreme Court ruling that EPA has the authority to regulate tailpipe emissions. […]
Pingback from Climate 411 » Legal Action to Compel EPA Compliance with Supreme Court - Blogs & Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:59 pm
[…] year ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that it lacked legal authority to regulate global warming pollution (for example, from vehicle […]
Pingback from Lawsuit Filed in Court of Appeals to Enforce Massachusetts v. EPA Climate Change Case « LAW OF THE LAND
April 2nd, 2008 at 8:02 pm
[…] in Court of Appeals to Enforce Massachusetts v. EPA Climate Change Case One year ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that it lacked legal authority to regulate global warming pollution. EPA administrator Stephen […]
Leave a Reply
You must log in to post comments | Login | Register an account
User comments reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of Environmental Defense Fund. We reserve the right to delete comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. We also reserve the right to delete duplicate comments, or comments that have no relationship to the original post.